翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Judgment debtor
・ Judgment Deferred
・ Judgment in Berlin
・ Judgment in Berlin (film)
・ Judgment Night
・ Judgment Night (collection)
・ Judgment Night (film)
・ Judgment Night (song)
・ Judgment Night (soundtrack)
・ Judgment Night (The Twilight Zone)
・ Judgment notwithstanding verdict
・ Judgment of God
・ Judgment of Line Orientation
・ Judgment of Paris (disambiguation)
・ Judgment of Paris (wine)
Judgment of Princeton
・ Judgment of Solomon
・ Judgment proof
・ Judgment sample
・ Judgment summons
・ Judgment!
・ Judgmental language
・ Judi
・ Judi Andersen
・ Judi Ann Mason
・ Judi Bari
・ Judi Barrett
・ Judi Bowker
・ Judi Brown
・ Judi Chamberlin


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Judgment of Princeton : ウィキペディア英語版
Judgment of Princeton
The Judgment of Princeton was a wine tasting (or blind tasting) event held on 8 June 2012 during a conference of the American Association of Wine Economists held at Princeton University in Princeton, New Jersey. The purpose of this event was to compare, by a blind tasting, of several French wines against wines produced in New Jersey in order to gauge the quality and development of the New Jersey wine industry. Because New Jersey's wine industry is relatively young and small, it has received little attention in the world wine market. The state's wine production has experienced growth in recent years largely as a result of state legislators offering new opportunities for winery licensing and repealing Prohibition-era laws that have constrained the industry's development in past years. This event was modeled after a 1976 blind tasting event dubbed the "Judgment of Paris" in which French wines were compared to several wines produced in California when that state's wine industry was similarly young and developing.
The New Jersey wine industry heralded the results and asserted that the rating of New Jersey wines by the blind tasting's judges was a victory for the state's wine industry.〔(【引用サイトリンク】publisher=Garden State Winegrower's Association )〕 However, several critics have publicly pointed out flaws in the competition including the comparison of weaker vintage French wines, and that that the results are statistically meaningless. Indeed, a couple of the event organizers have published papers criticizing the methods of the 1976 Judgment of Paris and undermining the effectiveness of wine tastings.〔Ashenfelter, Orley and Quandt, Richard E. ("Analyzing a Wine Tasting Statistically" ) from ''Chance 12'' (1999). Retrieved 26 January 2013.〕 One event organizer commented after the event that, "A statistical evaluation of the tasting ... further shows that the rank order of the wines was mostly insignificant. That is, if the wine judges repeated the tasting, the results would most likely be different. From a statistical viewpoint, most wines were indistinguishable."
==Details==
The Judgment of Princeton, held at Princeton University on Friday, June 8, 2012, was a structured blind tasting of top New Jersey wines against top French wines from Bordeaux and Burgundy.〔Brill, Emily. ("Hey, France, Jerseyans can make wine, too" ) in ''The Times of Trenton'' (10 June 2012). Retrieved 5 September 2013〕〔(Blind test finds NJ wines hold their own with French competitors. New Jersey Today, June 12, 2012. )〕〔(In Princeton, it’s Judgment Day for NJ Wine Industry, NJTV. )〕〔(Murphy, Linda. Judgment of Princeton Puts NJ on the map. JancisRobinson.com. )〕〔(Judgment of Princeton could be turning point for NJ wine. PBS New Jersey. )〕〔(Judgment of Princeton to pit Bordeaux and Burgundy against New Jersey. Bucks County Courier Times. )〕 The event was based on the famous 1976 Judgment of Paris (wine), in which California wines famously beat French wines in a blind tasting. The Judgment of Princeton was spearheaded by George M. Taber, who had been in Paris for the original Judgment of Paris and later written a book on the subject.〔Taber, George M ''Judgment of Paris: California vs France and the Historic Paris Tasting that Revolutionized Wine''. NY: Simon & Schuster, 2005. ISBN 0-7432-9732-6〕 Along with Taber, the tasting was organized and carried out by economists Orley Ashenfelter, Richard E. Quandt, Karl Storchmann, and Mark Censits, owner of CoolVines, a local wine and spirits shop, who acted in the role of merchant Steven Spurrier, gathering the competition wines from the NJ winemakers and selecting and sourcing the French wines against which they were to be pitted. The French wines were sourced from the same estates as the original wines of the Paris tasting. The event also included other members of the American Association of Wine Economists, who then posted the data set from the tastings online as an open invitation to further analysis.〔(AAWE: Tasting results )〕〔(Cowen, Tyler. Karl Storchmann reports from the front. Marginal Revolution, June 13, 2012. )〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Judgment of Princeton」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.